Home » Latest » Nintendo » Old vs New Switch: What Nintendo didn’t tell you

Old vs New Switch: What Nintendo didn’t tell you

3

InfoSearched 61 0 Nintendo

5.5

SaveSavedRemoved 0

Nintendo swapped out the Switch’s guts and only told you about the battery.

When Nintendo unveiled the Switch Lite in the summer of 2019, it also quietly rolled a second, easy-to-miss hardware revision into retail: model HAC-001(-01), commonly called the Switch V2. Nintendo’s official pitch was simple — longer battery life. YouTuber Kevin Kenson wasn’t satisfied with that explanation, so he and other hardware testers pulled the new unit apart to see what else had changed.

• Nintendo advertised battery life jumping from 2.5–6.5 hours to 4.5–9 hours, with The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild running roughly 5.5 hours on the V2 versus 3 hours on the original.
• Teardowns showed the internal battery capacity is unchanged — the gains come entirely from a more energy-efficient processor revision.
• Testers found a brighter display panel with different color temperature and white balance, altered Joy-Con analog stick assemblies, an all-red box, and new serial numbers starting with “XKW” instead of “XAW.”

The Battery Boost Nintendo Actually Advertised

Nintendo’s only public claim about the V2 was runtime. The company listed 4.5 to 9 hours of playtime, up from the original’s 2.5 to 6.5 hours, with Breath of the Wild as the benchmark: about 5.5 hours on the new hardware compared to 3 hours on the 2017 launch unit. On paper that’s the entire story Nintendo wanted told.

Kenson’s testing, along with other independent teardowns, confirmed the physical battery cell inside the new dock-free unit is the same size and rated capacity as before. The extra runtime isn’t coming from a bigger battery — it’s coming from a revised, more power-efficient processor, the same chip family Nintendo built into the handheld-only Switch Lite. That’s a meaningfully different story than “we made a bigger battery,” and it’s the kind of distinction Nintendo never spelled out in its own marketing.

Technical Analysis Reveals Hidden Components

Once testers had both consoles open side by side, the differences went well beyond the power draw. The V2’s screen showed noticeably improved brightness along with a different color temperature and white balance compared to the original 2017 panel — a swap Nintendo never mentioned in any press material.

The battery didn’t get bigger. The chip got smarter — and that’s the part Nintendo left out.

The rest of the shell told the same story of quiet iteration rather than a clean-slate redesign. Buyers who want to know before opening the box can check the model number and serial number on the packaging, since the V2 units ship in a new all-red box and carry serial numbers beginning with “XKW” instead of the original “XAW.”

The Joy-Con Question Nobody Got a Straight Answer On

The detail that got the most attention wasn’t the screen or the chip — it was the Joy-Cons. Testers identified altered internal analog stick assemblies inside the revised controllers, a change that immediately set off speculation about whether Nintendo was quietly addressing the Joy-Con drift problem that had plagued the original hardware since launch. Nintendo said nothing about it publicly, leaving hardware testers like Kenson to draw their own conclusions from what they found inside the plastic.

That silence fits a pattern for a company that has weathered plenty of hardware scrutiny before — including, further back in the Switch’s history, a lawsuit brought over a nine-year-old’s frustration with the original Joy-Con drift, a saga worth revisiting if you want the fuller backstory on how long this complaint has followed the console. It also sits inside a much longer story of console generations and revisions that stretches back decades, the kind of history tracked across the best-selling consoles from 1972 to 2019.

Nintendo never confirmed whether the new analog stick assembly does anything to reduce drift long-term, and without an official statement, testers were left running their own comparisons rather than trusting a company line. That’s the same gap Kenson’s video exists to fill — the stuff Nintendo didn’t say, verified by people who cracked the case open themselves.